Visit YouTube Trends

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Content ID turns three

Three years ago we announced Video Identification, a technology that broke new ground in the area of online rights management. It marked the first step towards what is known today as Content ID, a full set of audio and video matching tools that give rights holders fine-grained controls for managing their content if someone uploads it YouTube. Participating rights holders provide us with reference files of their content, and before we publish any videos to YouTube we check them against these reference files. If we find a match, the rights holder gets the choice of blocking, tracking, or making money from the video. Here’s how it works:



Fast forward to 2010. We’ve just passed a significant milestone: more than 100 million videos have been claimed with Content ID. Nearly every major media company and music label in the world uses our tools. The number of reference files provided to us by rights holders now stands at more than four million, or over 300,000 hours of content - we think it’s the most comprehensive database of its kind in the world.

Rights holders who claim their content with Content ID generally more than double the number of views against which we can run ads, doubling their potential revenue. And we’re seeing media companies make the most of this revenue opportunity - in the last quarter alone, claims to make money from videos increased 200%. Content ID contributes more than a third of YouTube’s monetized views each week, and overall, the revenue generated by Content ID is financing the ongoing creation of culture, both by established artists and new ones,

When we developed Content ID, we were hopeful that we’d gone some way toward helping solve a really tough problem -- how to manage rights issues, across platforms and countries, in a quickly evolving technology world. We’ve already invested tens of millions of dollars in this technology, and we’ll keep investigating new ways to give rights holders ever better tools, while supporting new forms of creative expression.

David King, product manager, recently watched "Milky vs Lil Demon".



30 comments:

Church said...

Pity it doesn't take into account transformative use and the like.

leslie-gale said...

in terms of "rights issues" How does this feature fit with videos that censor comments by "comment pending approval"?...Using this tool limits freedom of type/print yet the very backbone of Youtube is freedom of expression

Andrew said...

Locking down freedom and the internet, one video at a time, go Google!

Urgo said...

So now that its three years old when are you letting more people in? I applied on June 21, 2010 and am still waiting :(

root said...

Content ID is depressing because it doesn't give us any rights.

Phillip said...

Love this service, it allows companies to monetize videos that users have created using infringing material, without having the material removed!

Michael Mollica said...

Yay, Vevo! (sarcasm)

Warren said...

TOO BAD WMG IS EXPLOITING THIS!

TheChrisD said...

You seem to write this like it's a good thing...

Eric/Sunny said...

wat about fair use? the computer should be made to detect that automatically.

Master Otenko said...

ContentID has still got some frauds - I noticed that a lot of karaoke video, where the video maker sung were deleted due to "copyright" but even worse were the copyright claims of IGN against gamers and other gaming reviewers of Epic Mickey laterly. A human beeing would see, that the content is generated by the channel maker, but since parts of a game are very simmilar (e.g. cutscenes) the ContentID-bots "think" it is material of a YouTube-partner. Sadly industrial YouTube-partners are prefered and for "normal" users it is almost impossible to reach a responsable human beeing via the support.

Alan Morris said...

That's great. What is not clear is how amateur, not for profit YouTube contributors can use portions copyrighted material in their videos for which the copyright holder has claims and continue to use it and allow the owner of the copyright to monetize it. If you read your copyright policy, I believe it is very strict and no one should upload copyrighted material. But I see it all the time, Very confusing,

Lynn Hemeon Photos said...

Every time I get a content match it scares the crap out of me and I delete the video. I have one strike against me and can't afford to get any more.

joakim said...

Censorship win

Groudon199 said...

"Hey, you wanna post a Guitar Hero/Rock Band video?"
"No way. I'm not gonna risk having my account suspended because of the content ID system."

Wolfie said...

Surprise surprise, content ID and money.

Peter Valencia said...

We all hate it, instead of automatic "We can do whatever we want" from the record label (I'm talking about WMG & Sony) we should be given a choice to Accept the choice
Dispute The choice
(Misidentification, Fair Use etc.)
or Work It Out with record label

Darr247 said...

Pity also it doesn't protect the little guy who uploads original content only to have it stolen right off youtube's site then reposted, many times garnering more hits on the stolen repost than those for which the rightful owner was credited.

Danny Zeff said...

And from then on, countless YouTubers would yell at WMG for muting their audio (myself included).

Shadow said...

3 years of this process getting abused and illegally used by big corporations. Way to go youtube.......

Fouge said...

Yeah this system is pretty much a fail. If my video gets block that means somebody's gonna die.

virarneeda said...

and this is why facebook needs a dislike button.

jacobgrocks said...

I think this needs to be changed to 3 years since youtube died. Youtube died when they started muting music, and AMVs on youtube got blocked too.

dimomarg said...

The System that brought the companies that fuck our **** turns 3. Yaaaay.

rosliu31 said...

The way this post is tell sounds like "great news" but it´s shit...a lot of people used Youtube to show any kind of talent they got,just for fun or to entertain others...without any kind of money shit.I have an account because i love making vids just for pure fun and i think Youtube is going down the hill with this shitty news...Good luck to you!!! *oh yeah i´m using my sarcasm*

kwag4 said...

Just shows how Google and YouTube will do anything as long as it helps the stock holders, even if it hurts the people that made it so popular to start - the average user.

fouge642 said...

YouTube are you reading these comments? NO ONE LIKES CONTENT ID!!! So to make your customers that much happier, I suggest you GET RID OF CONTENT ID!!!

allen.kirshner029 said...

Only YouTube could see this as something worth celebrating. Shows how totally out of touch you are with your users.

Joe-Anybody said...

So obviously....its all about the $
This article and any I read from YT never speak of the Fair Use Act, none speak of (their) "threats of suspending my account due to copyright infringements"? ...Yet now I see many folks using copyrighted music, and it is OK ?....(Now YT is allowing some (??) to use music with adds)

And yet its very unclear when and who's music can I use. The YT company writes articles like this telling us all how great their services are becoming ...yet I read all the comments and see that the topic and concern of this matter is not being addressed at all by YT (??).....

They brag about all the $ copyrighters can now make....but what about folks who are not here to "sell" or "make money" ..... we are not even being addressed.

Can I use copyrighted material like in how this article brags YT is allowing? ...or is WMG or SONY or someone from YT trolling for Content ID matches. I mean what is it? I have been told one more time and my account will be suspended, but can I get clarity on this ..... obviously not. (its all about the $)

AlanTaylor925 said...

Awful system at the moment for me.

I have false claims being made on some of my videos where third parties are claiming they own the music on my videos yet clearly are not. One such claim was from a organization called SME. Clearly, they are miss using the system and ripping me off. Very unhappy that the dispute system hasn't worked for me as the organization has counter claimed, basically lied back to me.

This system is prone to liars to miss use the system.

We need it to be improved.

Post a Comment